Skip to content
  • Home
  • About
  • Podcasts
    • Audio
    • Video
  • Videos
  • No Nest Egg Retirement Plan
  • LOGIN
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Podcasts
    • Audio
    • Video
  • Videos
  • No Nest Egg Retirement Plan
  • LOGIN
Tue, 22, August, 2023

WEBINAR TODAY

RPR250

MORE INFORMATION

Ian Bond is a private banking senior executive with over three decades of experience in wealth and asset management with Goldman Sachs, Credit Suisse, and Citigroup. He has built major businesses on four continents.
Despite his professional responsibility for assets over $100B and revenues over $1B, after the 2008 crash Ian was personally going broke. Within five years he destroyed his debt, became an expat in 2014, and built multiple streams of income to fund his imminent retirement. Ian is also the founder of MyRetirementRehab.me created to help other executives and professionals rehabilitate their finances and make a prosperous, enduring retirement a reality.
NE Reading List

Follow Us

Facebook Twitter Rss

The No Nest Egg Retirement Plan

At this point in your life, you’ve heard a lot of retirement advice. Probably the most well-known from the retirement planning cannon is the 4% rule.

Start by withdrawing 4% of your savings during your first year of retirement, then adjust that amount for inflation year after year. That will make sure your nest egg is well distributed across your retirement, right?

Not anymore.

The 4% rule used to be a nifty rule-of-thumb, but it’s not really relevant at all to today’s retiree.

Here are 3 reasons why:

  1. You’ll probably spend more early on

Let’s face it, downsizing your life is a serious process. It can take years before you get yourself to the point where you’re spending significantly less than you did pre-retirement. This is a pitfall that most retirees today fall in with the 4% rule — they simply can’t keep up with it during those first years. And unfortunately, that excess spending upsets the whole scenario for the rest of your retirement.

  1. Interest rates aren’t what they used to be

When William Bengen first thought up the 4% rule, he made some smart assumptions: Even though you’d be slightly increasing the amount you withdraw year-over-year, the returns on your investment portfolio will make up for it.

The problem is that the 4% rule was first developed back in 1994, when interest rates were more than 3x what they are today. So even if you do keep more of your money in investments throughout your retirement, it’s much less likely to keep up with inflation and your growing health needs year-after-year.

  1. Your retirement will be long

Another thing that’s very different between 1994 and 2017 is life expectancy. The 4% rule is based on a retirement of 30 years or less. If you retire at 65, then you’ll need to be dead by the time you’re 95, or just run out of money.

That could work out just fine, but how much are you willing to bet you won’t live beyond that age? Between low interest rates and extra spending early in retirement, it’s already likely you’ll run out of money well before 95 anyway.

The 4% rule really doesn’t make any sense for today’s pre-retiree.

If the 4% rule doesn’t work, then what’s your real retirement solution?

Learn More in Section 5 – “How Wealth is Created“

Copyright © 2016-2019 Retirement Rehab. All rights reserved.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.